Affinity DataKi: 0.130nM ΔG°: -13.3kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.390nM ΔG°: -12.7kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.400nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.400nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.5nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.5nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.5nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.5nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.5nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.600nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.600nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.700nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.700nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.700nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.800nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.800nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.900nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.900nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 0.900nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.30nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.40nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.40nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.5nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.60nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.70nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 1.80nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.10nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.10nM ΔG°: -11.7kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.15nM ΔG°: -11.7kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.25nM ΔG°: -11.7kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.30nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.30nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.55nM ΔG°: -11.6kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 2.75nM ΔG°: -11.6kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.10nM ΔG°: -11.5kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.20nM ΔG°: -11.5kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.5nM ΔG°: -11.4kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.60nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.70nM ΔG°: -11.4kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 3.80nM ΔG°: -11.4kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 4.05nM ΔG°: -11.3kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 4.5nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 4.70nM ΔG°: -11.2kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 5nM ΔG°: -11.2kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 5.40nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 6.60nM ΔG°: -11.0kcal/molepH: 7.4 T: 2°CAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 6.70nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataKi: 8nMAssay Description:IC50 values were obtained by fitting the competition binding curves according to a 4-parameter logistic model. Inhibition constants Ki were derived f...More data for this Ligand-Target Pair